Questions at BHRUT seeking information for preparation for second Judicial Review against the Tesco Toxic Towers

 

Q1 Today,  the Sunday Times is reporting substantial cuts to BHRUT and other English hospitals per the photo attached.

How many medical staff will be cut as a consequence of these cuts, and can I have an assurance that children's services will be protected?

Q2 Does the board agree the rights given to residents under the Aarhus convention mean that this board should be willing to give confidential patient information, such as full postcodes, date of admission etc to an academic regarding child deaths and hospital admission linked to air pollution to test to whether the Mayor’s modelled data on this subject withstands scrutiny?

Reason High Rise Towers are being built across London, but the type of filter and how high they should be at the proposed towers appears arbitrary. Examining past child health data and future data is essential tool to protecting children from pollution.

Q3 This is a verbal request using rights given to residents using environmental regulations based upon the Aarhus convention asking the board to give me all correspondence between this board and the London Mayor MPs, GLA members and Councillors, relating to how BHRUT should cope with the increased population caused by the London Plan in the previous five years.

Q4  This is a verbal request using rights given to residents using environmental regulations based upon the Aarhus convention asking the board to give me all correspondence between this board and MPs, GLA members, Councillors and NHS relating to the reported £35M A&E rebuild.

Q5  This is a verbal request using rights given to residents using environmental regulations based upon the Aarhus convention asking the board to disclose how many, if any, extra in-patient beds will be built in the proposed £35M A&E extension.